Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Keywords:
mechanical approach; Hubble law; Friedmann equation; Einstein equation; scalar perturbation; tensor of energy-momentum
Summary:
Standard approach in cosmology is hydrodynamical approach, when galaxies are smoothed distributions of matter. Then we model the Universe as a fluid. But we know, that the Universe has a discrete structure on scales 150 - 370 MPc. Therefore we must use the generalized mechanical approach, when is the mass concentrated in points. Methods of computations are then different. We focus on $f(R)$-theories of gravity and we work in the cell of uniformity in the late Universe. We do the scalar perturbations and we use 3 approximations. First we neglect the time derivatives and we do the astrophysical approach and we find the potentials $\Phi $ and $\Psi $ in this case. Then we do the large scalaron mass approximation and we again obtain the potentials. Final step is the quasi-static approximation, when we use the equations from astrophysical approach and the result are the potentials $\Phi $ and $\Psi $. The resulting potentials are combination of Yukawa terms, which are characteristic for $f(R)$-theories, and standard potential.
References:
[1] Berry, C.P.L., Gair, J.R.: Linearized $f(R)$ gravity: gravitational radiation and solar system tests. Phys. Rev. D 83 1004022 (2011), arXiv:1104.0819.
[2] Burgazli, A., Eingorn, M., Zhuk, A.: Rigorous theoretical constraint on constant negative EoS parameter $w$ and its effect for late Universe. Eur. Phys. J. C 75 118 (2015), arXiv:1301.0418. DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3335-7
[3] Eingorn, M.: First-order cosmological perturbationsengendered by point-like masses. arXiv:1509.03835v3.
[4] Eingorn, M., Novák, J., Zhuk, A.: $f(R)$ gravity:scalar peturbations in the late Universe. Eur. Phys. J. C 74 3005 (2014), arXiv:astro-ph/1401.5410. DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3005-1
[5] Eingorn, M., Zhuk, A.: Hubble flows and gravitational potentials in observable Universe. arXiv:1205.2384. MR 2989879
[6] Eingorn, M., Zhuk, A.: Weak-field limit of $f(R)$-gravity in three and more spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 84 024023 (2011), arXiv:1104.1456 [gr-qc]. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024023
[7] Eingorn, M., Zhuk, A.: Remarks on mechanical approach to observable universe. JCAP 05 024 (2014), arXiv: 1309.4924. MR 3219178
[8] Garcia-Bellido, J.: Cosmology and astrophysics. arXiv: astro-ph/0502139.
[9] Hu, W., Sawicky, I.: Models of $f(R)$ cosmic acceleration that evade solar system test. Phys. Rev. D 76 064004 (2007), arxiv:0705.1158 [astro-ph].
[10] Jaime, L.G., Patino, L., Salgado, M.: $f(R)$ cosmology revisted. arXiv:1206.1642 [gr-qc].
[11] Jaime, L.G., Patino, L., Salgado, M.: Note on the equation of state of geometric dark-energy in f(R) gravity. Phys. Rev.D 89 084010 (2014), arXiv:gr-qc/1312.5428. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084010
[12] Miranda, V., Joras, S., Waga, I., Quartin, M.: Viable singularity-free f(R)-gravity without a cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 221101 (2009), arXiv: 0905.1941 [astro-ph]. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.221101
[13] Naf, J., Jetzer, P.: On the $1/c$ expansion of $f(R)$ gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81 104003 (2010), arXiv:1004.2014 [gr-qc].
[14] Riess, A.G. et al., : Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating Universe and a cosmological constant. Astronom. J. 116 (1998), 1009–1038. DOI 10.1086/300499
[15] Starobinsky, A.A.: Disappearing cosmological constant in $f(R)$ gravity. JETP Lett 86 (2007), 157–163, arXiv:0706.2041. DOI 10.1134/S0021364007150027
[16] Tsujikawa, S., Udin, K., Tavakol, R.: Density perturbations in $f(R)$ gravity theories in metric and Palatini formalisms. Phys. Rev. D 77 043007 (2008), arXiv:0712.0082v2. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043007 | MR 2421223
Partner of
EuDML logo