Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Keywords:
orthomodular lattice; quantum logic; concrete logic; set representation; automorphism group of a logic; state space
Summary:
The main result of this paper is Theorem 3.3: Every concrete logic (i.e., every set-representable orthomodular poset) can be enlarged to a concrete logic with a given automorphism group and with a given center. Since every sublogic of a concrete logic is concrete, too, and since not every state space of a (general) quantum logic is affinely homeomorphic to the state space of a concrete logic [8], our result seems in a sense the best possible. Further, we show that every group is an automorphism group of a concrete lattice logic and, on the other hand, we prove that this is not true for Boolean logics with a dense center. As a technical tool for pursuing the latter type of problems, we investigate the correspondence between homomorphisms of concrete logics and pointwise mappings of their domain. We prove that in a suitable topological representation of concrete logics, every automorphism is carried by a homeomorphism.
References:
[1] Groot J. de, McDowell R.H.: Autohomeomorphism groups of 0-dimensional spaces. Compositio Math. 15 (1963), 203-209. MR 0154267
[2] Gudder S.P.: Stochastic Methods in Quantum Mechanics. North Holland, New York, 1979. MR 0543489 | Zbl 0439.46047
[3] Iturrioz L.: A representation theory for orthomodular lattices by means of closure spaces. Acta Math. Hung. 47 (1986), 145-151. MR 0836405 | Zbl 0608.06008
[4] Kallus M., Trnková V.: Symmetries and retracts of quantum logics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 26 (1987), 1-9. MR 0890206
[5] Kalmbach G.: Orthomodular Lattices. Academic Press, London, 1983. MR 0716496 | Zbl 0554.06009
[6] Kalmbach G.: Automorphism groups of orthomodular lattices. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 29 (1984), 309-313. MR 0748724 | Zbl 0538.06009
[7] Navara M.: The independence of automorphism groups, centres and state spaces in quantum logics. to appear.
[8] Navara M.: An alternative proof of Shultz's theorem. to appear.
[9] Navara M., Pták P.: Almost Boolean orthomodular posets. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 60 (1989), 105-111. MR 1014608
[10] Navara M., Rogalewicz V.: The pasting constructions for orthomodular posets. to appear in Math. Nachrichten. MR 1138377 | Zbl 0767.06009
[11] Pták P.: Logics with given centres and state spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (1983), 106-109. MR 0691287
[12] Pták P., Pulmannová S.: Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics. Kluwer, 1991 (to appear). MR 1176314
[13] Pultr A., Trnková V.: Combinatorial, Algebraic and Topological Representations of Groups, Semigroups and Categories. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980 and Academia, Praha, 1980. MR 0563525
[14] Sikorski R.: Boolean Algebras. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1969. MR 0126393 | Zbl 0191.31505
[15] Tkadlec J.: Set representations of orthoposets. Proc. 2-nd Winter School on Measure Theory (Liptovský Ján, 1990), Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, 1990. MR 1118430 | Zbl 0777.06009
[16] Zierler N., Schlessinger M.: Boolean embeddings of orthomodular sets and quantum logic. Duke Math. J. 32 (1965), 251-262. MR 0175520
Partner of
EuDML logo